Wednesday, January 29, 2020

letterboxd backup (6)

Smart Money, Alfred E. Green, 1931

While in LITTLE CAESAR, Robinson is pure will to power, an ascetic almost without bodily needs, here he is a hedonist with a sentimental core. His true problem seems to be that he is a bit overeager in his attempts to connect to the world - thus the weird tick to rub on people and things with his fingers.

It really is a shame that he and Cagney only made one film together, given that in this one they more or less play an old married couple and seem to be comfortable doing so. Cagney's hysterical pantomime act is the kind of out of nowhere bit which only works because the film earns its audience's trust from the beginning.

The women, while being constantly objectified as so many blondes, are actually treated quite meticulously, each one evoking a separate, distinct melodrama in just a couple of scenes. Especially Evalyn Knapp: She's in the film for not much more than 15 minutes, but as soon as she appears, she becomes the clear center of attention. The scene in which she timidly offers Robinson her room key and thereby herself is a perfect example of what american cinema lost after the code and in a way never fully got back: the matter-of-fact ackowledgment of sexuality not as individualized desire (for this, there are workarounds even under the strictest of censorships), but as social reality.

The best scene comes a bit later, though: Knapp first putting incriminating evidence in Robinson's jacket, and then, immediately afterwards, tenderly touching, even clinging to its sleeve. Deceit and affection almost literally in the same gesture. But both by proxy. A true connection has, once again, not been made.

Nevada, Edward Killy, 1944

Mitchum could've had a very good career in b westerns alone. In this early try the surfaces are still smooth, but there's already a dangerous, violent, antisocial undercurrent in his performance which sets him miles apart from the likes of Gene Autry. The typically overstuffed plot moves along nicely, although judging from the much better THE FARGO KID, Killy was more comfortable with comic material.

Richard Martin is really annoying in this one.

La pere des mes enfants, Mia Hansen-Love, 2009

Dispersion of energy. In the beginning, Grégoire - juggling his professional and private life through multiple parallel phone calls while driving and smoking - tries to hold all the threads together, but soon he runs out of steam and the film takes over from there, starting to disintegrate long before the suicide. Hansen-Love, who (unlike Assayas) always seems to thoroughly identify herself with the world of her films, resists the urge to dissect the life of her protagonist, instead following up on some of the traces he left behind.

It feels transitory, but of course everything, and especially the disintegration, is perfectly controlled (sometimes, I thought while rewatching it, even a bit too much so). My favorite scene comes in the middle of grief: A short pilgrimage of Sylvia and her daughters to a chapel they visited earlier with Grégoire, a short, completely mute miniature, like an altar built from embodied memory and symmetrical shot positioning.

The Monster and the Girl, Stuart Heisler, 1941

Another programmer oddity from Heisler, not quite on par with AMONG THE LIVING, but fascinating nonetheless. A convoluted courtroom drama with a noiry flashback structure and alluring somnambulistic acting gives way, halfway through the film, to a straightforward creature feature, which moves along at an almost comically steady pace. The gorilla refuses to be rushed, and because he seems to be invisible to everybody but one small dog, he alone gets to set the pace, everyone else has to follow suit.

Two nice broadcasting bits: a radio announcer shoving aside an accordeon player before delivering a piece of important news. And one of the gangsters, after discovering his slain colleague, changing the radio station from jazz to classical in order to provide a different death tune for himself.

Dr. Ehrlich`s Magic Bullet, William Dieterle, 1940

Kind of a weird film: There's an obvious undercurrent relating to the more recent developments in Germany, starting with an acknowledgment of antisemitism - which isn't being followed up on later at all. Same with all the other allusions to concrete politics. There might even be a vague interventionist stance hidden in the plot somewhere, but in the end, the film always withdraws into the save fight against universal forms of suffering. In the end, Warner really didn't want to take a chance with this one.

So it never breaks away from the bearded guys with German accents microscoping formula, but at least in the second half there are a few wacky moments - Donald Meek shows up to provide some comic relief (relief really being the correct expression, here), the word "syphilis" triggers a burst of montage amidst an otherwise solemn mise-en-scene, and there's an interesting attempt to depict the point of view of a blind man.

Tiger Shark, Howard Hawks, 1932

I remembered the fishing scenes much better than the rest, which isn't all that strange, probably, also because they are truly surprising for the era the film was shot in. Long before the war films working with newsreel footage (and also long before LA TERRA TREMA) Hawks perfectly integrates documentary style shots into his narrative. What's more, the fishing scenes aren't just interested in texture and spectacle, but also in procedure - the short montage following the assembly line of fish processing, the close-up of a hook being beaten into shape.

The fiction itself is well done, too, and very Hawksian, especially in the scenes with all three members of the love triangle: Not only Johann, but also Robinson have more eyes for Arlen than for each other. In fact, the only small problem may be that Johann is almost too good an actress in this. Especially in her first scene with Robinson she evokes, by way of a view glances and her obstinate stature, a biographical depth and also a depth of inner life which the film isn't willing to elaborate on, later. Her home life with Robinson, which is supposed to break her, isn't represented at all. Which is, of course, also typical of Hawks who just wouldn't bother himself with petit bourgeoise domesticity.

Smart Blonde, Frank McDonald, 1937

Normally I tend to lose interest in straight whudonits like this about two thirds of the way - the world exploration phase is usually much more interesting than the final twists and turns. SMART BLONDE didn't quite escape this trap, although the plot clearly is above average with a few unexpected moves. Farrell is great (her short bursts of ironic laughter), though not quite autonomous enough. Tom Kennedy alone makes sure this is at least a three star film.

Rubber, Quentin Dupieux, 2009

Works because no matter what you thing of all the metanarrative absurdities, an autonomously rolling tire is inherently cinematographic.

Fly Away Baby, Frank McDonald, 1937
Tosses the straight whodunit concept in favor of a mixture of comedy vignettes, adventure and exoticism, which works better for the overall mood of these films. Plus, Farrell has much more room this time and she knows how to use it.

Synnöve Solbakken, John W. Brunius, 1919

Synnöve lives up the hill, on the sunny side, and she seldom ventures down. Into the shadows, where Thorbjörn lives, in love probably more with the idea of a female being from the sunny hill than with Synnöve herself.

The romance starts in church, the only acceptable place of social gathering. A symmetrical composition, exhibiting a symmetrical world: On the left, the world of women, on the right, the world of men, between both, the priest.

The film stays mostly in the shadows, with Thorbjörn, who suffers through melodramatic complications reformulated as paradoxical ethical predicaments: Only if you reject desire, Synnöve tells him, are you allowed to desire me.

The lovers have just a handful of scenes together. Synnöve does have her own desires, but she acts on them only twice, mostly she stays up in the light, sometimes joined by Thorbjörn's sister, the only person in the film who can easily move between the two worlds. Synnöve, being an idea more than a bodily entity, doesn't have to act, she just has to make an appearance once in a while, to make her presence felt, through single shots of her hovering in the sun far above the dark and brooding village. Short bursts of light inserted into the earthbound world of Thorbjörn.

Unholy Partners, Mervyn LeRoy, 1941

Starts as a probably more or less conscious throwback to the high-speed procedurals LeRoy and Robinson excelled in at Warner in the early 30s (FIVE STAR FINAL being the most obvious comparison, right down to the office romance side plot). Later, the film slows down and transforms itself into a character drama with some rather weird twists.

It's easy to see films like this as watered-down, much more bourgeois remnants of the precode tradition. But at the same time there's a density in texture and a psychological depth the earlier films did not reach or even aim for.

Even if Robinson probably did play this particular role a few times too often by 1941, LeRoy's mise-en-scene is rich and inventive throughout, especially in the parts not concerend with the main plot. The scenes with Marsha Hunt and the wonderfully awkward William T. Orr are especially touching, the camera measuring, again and again, the distance between the two not-quite lovers, with Orr constantly being drawn towards the perfectly inviting Hunt but unable to make the crucial move, to bridge the gap in any meaningful way.

Ne te retourne pas, Marina de Van, 2009

A film about the inner hysterics of cinema as private fantasy. How can I stay myself when Marceau transforms into Bellucci before my very eyes?

The Curse of Frankenstein, Terence Fisher, 1957

Not nearly as fast-moving and lurid as DRACULA one year later, but its minimalist simplicity has a charme all its own. The monster is the closest thing to a complex character in this. Everyone else is set dead on his or her (libidinous) track at the start and follows through until the bitter end.

The Cushing close-ups are a force of nature.

Ich seh ich seh, Severin Fiala / Veronika Franz, 2014

Familiar beats from austrian auteur cinema (oddly enough more of the Haneke than of the Seidl variety) reformulated as an A24 horror film. Martin Gschlacht has free rein, but luckily there's also the wonderful Susanne Wuest.

Waterloo Bridge, Mervyn LeRoy, 1940

"It seems there are no rules..."

An incredibly daring, almost experimental approach to affect and subjectivity. Vivian Leigh's face is the main laboratory. It starts out as a simple, easily malleable surface, ready to glide into love at any moment. And when additional layers are introduces, it is, at least at first, not because of romantic love, but because of her friendship with Kitty.

Later, in the film's most astonishing shot, her becoming a prostitute is depicted in a single take, with her looking at the men around her in an utterly new way. Like discovering the world a second time.
Even Robert Taylor's relative stiffness is an asset, because the whole last act is built around the juxtaposition of his naive, singleminded enthusiasm with Leigh's complex interiority.

Walk In, Herman Yau, 1997

Funny body switch comedy which never quite gets as hysterical as one could expect (except for the scenes with the wonderful Ada Choi). But on the other hand, Yau, as usual, takes his setup a little bit more serious than other directors would. The Danny Lee character especially is truly fascinating: Getting "invaded" by a frustrated, ambitious, younger guy, while also constantly being harassed by the repercussions of his older, philandering, more relaxed self - and feeling equally helpless towards both of these conflicting impulses. Layers of masculinity...

It is of course easy to connect the concept of "walk in" with the chinese takeover. Which might have, judging fromt this, also have had something to do with sexual insecurities.

Un amour de jeunesse, Mia Hansen-Love, 2011

I remember being bugged by Urzendowsky the first time I saw this. Which is strange, because he is pretty great here with his slightly inhibited body language. At least way better than Brekke, who downright oozes the sort of cultured-man-of-the-world sensibilities Hansen-Love's films sometimes are a bit too much enthralled by. The whole getting-into-architecture storyline is pretty strange, taking (expecially musical) shortcuts she usually doesn't take. I mean, Brekke takes his students to Berlin, of all places, Europe's prime hub for bad architecture. This alone should makes it clear for everyone how big a phony he is.

The first part, with Urzendowsky, is beautiful though, especially the almost wordless Ardèche trip, as is the ending, the bath in the river (Hansen-Love's films always make me miss the countryside), the short glance towards the image of happy family life Camille feels she's drifting away from.

Burger Boy`s, Lav Diaz, 1999

Not at all the slight comedy this is sometimes described at, but an ambitious, freewheeling metanarrative foreshadowing a lot of Diaz's later concerns and even some of his signature shots. Not all of it works, but at least it is a good reminder that Diaz is, at heart, not a realist but a filmmaker of the grotesque.

The Last Laugh, Greg Pritikin, 2019

Whenever a modern comedy is generally described as being lazy, tired and primarily an excuse for a few washed-up stars hanging out, I take notice. It almost always pays off.

Kid Galahad, Michael Curtiz, 1937

The way Curtiz controls the flow of the story during the final fight both in- and outside the ring, while also maintaining a sense of chaotic exhilaration - and all so effortless, without the soundstage-as-battlefield-bravado directors of later decades inevitably would fall back on when directing a film like this.

In the end, this isn't even about boxing, or about Robinson who may be the center of the script (connecting all the dots)... but the center of the film is Davis, or rather the triangle of Davis, Jane Bryan and Wayne Morris. Two women in love with a man. The courtship takes the form of handling the image of the man: one woman carefully collects newspaper clippings of his triumphs, the other nervously rips a single newspaper with his printed face in shreds while listening to his fight on the radio. Obviously her love is deeper.

A few moments: Davis and Morris riding on the back of the train, drifting into and out of a flirt. Bryan's face downright beaming next to a group of freshly hatched chicks. Robinson talking to his mother in italian for what feels like two full minutes.

Die Küken kommen, Eckhart Schmidt, 1985

An anarchistic, almost formless military comedy about young recruits breaking away from the drill in order to live it up in Munich. Chock-full of the kind of manic overacting that beats you (or at least me) into submission. The most out there of the guys (Andreas Jung) is also my favourite.

By way of a group of girls pursuing the boys, Schmidt's usual romantic extremism also comes into play. The film nevertheless is so obviously at odds with the director's instincts that it almost feels like the result of a bet he made (and lost) with himself.

I still like it though, except for the very bad background music. Never a moment's peace in this one.

The Woman in the Window, Fritz Lang, 1944

Midway through, Robinson gets promoted from assistant professor directly to department head. Dream logic.

Batang West Side, Lav Diaz, 2001

A displaced struggle and the struggle of displacement constantly reinforcing each other... but also, in a way, cancelling each other out because in the end man is always alone.

(Finally gave up on waiting for a print of this screening in my vicinity and watched the rather abysmal version floating around. Of course, it immediately sucks you in nonetheless. Still, Lav Diaz filming two men fishing at the Jersey Shore on a foggy winter day on colour 35mm stock is something I really need to see under better circumstances someday.)

It`s Me, Eckhart Schmidt, 2017

Schmidt's second version of Pavese's short story "Suicidi", after the magnificent SUNSET MOTEL, this time omitting the male protagonist completely. There's just one woman on a hotel bed calling her lover on her mobile phone. And in between the frustrating calls, dreaming of a sepia-toned Venice.

We don't even hear his voice. He exists only in her reactions. The story, if there would be a story, would be a familiar if rather anachronistic one. She is ecstatically in love, he is evasive. He has his job (and probably other women), she has just him.

When she's on the phone, the camera hovers over her face, closing in on her and backing away again. The extreme close-ups do not, actually, bring us closer to her, though. Just the opposite, the more the camera closes in on her, the more she's transformed into a cypher. While the completely indifferent, neutral hotel room background stays sharp, her face melts out of focus.

For the most part, she isn't a complete body. When she's on the phone, she becomes an extension of the phone. His voice activates parts of her (once they even have phone sex) but not the whole. Only when she hangs up, the camera drifts towards other body parts, or even allows her to step back a bit, to become a full entity. The thoughts of him are allowed to flow a bit more freely through her limbs. But even then, she is never caught unaware, never seen drifting away. She becomes image only as far as she is in love.

From the Queen to the Chief Executive, Herman Yau, 2001

From the outside, it merely looks like a cynical move of the british autorities to only allow for at least some form of democratic discourse in Hong Kong to emerge when the takeover already was agreed upon (starting with political reforms in the early 80s). But Yau's film makes clear that, when experienced from the inside, the political developments of these years were a full-blown tragedy. FROM THE QUEEN TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE registers as a longing for a democratic space that never was, with a very bitter coda.

It starts out rather convoluted, and there really is too much crammed into it, but when the focus switches from Yue Ling to Leung and his more straightforward political fight, it becomes very affecting. The casting of mostly unknowns mostly works, although I have to admit that I was constantly irritated by Ah Jing's passive sweetness. Stephen Tang's softness on the other hand is wonderful, his inner breakdown in the scene with his son is heartbreaking.

Great use of music. I don't care much for the heroism of rock any more, but here it earns its place.

The Undercover Man, Joseph H. Lewis, 1949

Procedural about halfway between the still somewhat romantic de-Rochemont-Hathaway "documentary" noirs and the much colder war on crime films of the fifties. A slow, but constant forward movement, with the violence underneath it mostly staying offscreen.

The realistic low contrast lighting is somewhat at odds with Lewis's inventiveness, resulting in often extremely, claustrophobic, crammed spaces. No room for decisive movements (Barry Kelley is the only one trying, repeatedly, and his failures might be the most alluring part of the film), just lots of detailed shuffling around, until everything finally falls into place.

Our Vines Have Tender Grapes, Roy Rowland, 1945

Some of the scenes purely focussing on Selma's experience (the one with the elephant, especially) are extremely beautiful, as is the production design, yet I mostly couldn't stand this. Trumbo seems to be undecided whether his classic Americana setting shold be transformed into a socialist utopia; or if this socialist utopia is already there, available for anyone with the correct nature metaphor at hand. In any case, his characters take turns in becoming his mouthpieces in a rather obnoxious way, transforming all lived-in details into talking points for an agenda which, in the end, doesn't dare to properly speak itself anyway. The romance of the schoolteacher and the editor, meanwhile, is like something out of the dreariest corners of socialist realism.

Random Harvest, Mervyn LeRoy, 1942

"It must come from the inside..."
Another experimental melodrama from LeRoy, once again the war experience, romantic love and peak studio era artificiality join forces in order to transform the world beyond all recognition.

Just as devestating as WATERLOO BRDIGE, and even crazier. In fact, much crazier, it should be locked into an asylum. And then it should escape, searching for Greer Garson.

The Sisters Brothers, Jacques Audiard, 2018

I didn't care for Audiard's last two films, but at least he managed to hold up the tension, even if in extremely contrived settings. This, however, just feels like a complete cop-out: tired revisionist western tropes coupled with indiewood humour (relentlesly pounding the same note over and over again, especially in the scenes with Reilly and Phoenix) and a few hints at technical competence in the action scenes.

Strange that this isn't a netflix film, feels like one from start to finish.

Second Act, Peter Segal, 2018

The fever dreams of capitalism.

(I mean, who the hell thought: the jenny-from-the-block-goes-corporate-premise plus the bonkers lost daughter storyline aren't enough, so why not bring in Hiroshima?)

Leah Remini

Blossoms in the Dust, Mervyn LeRoy, 1941

In preparing for the dance, Greer Garson and Marsha Hunt put on identical, spectacular blue dresses. When they step down the stairs (one of those shots Technicolor was invented for), we see that their boyfriends also look alike: moustached and a bit mousy. The perfect symmetry is broken when Walter Pidgeon enters, sidetracking Garson's glance, movement, affection, and ultimately, fate.

A beautiful beginning for what turns out to be a mostly uninspired biopic, steamrolling over every hint at emotional nuance. Almost as if the film dies with Marsha - the scene leading up to her suicide, after just ten minutes, is the second standout moment. The way LeRoy manages to transform her mundane crossing of a room into a decisive movement, a cinematic gesture...

Barbara - Wild wie das Meer, Frank Wisbar, 1961

Harriet Andersson's last glance directly into the camera so much mesmerized me, I had forgotten that quite a few scenes end with her enigmatically glancing at someone or other.

Also, I always forget just how good Peter Fleischmann is in this. A petty meanness with a sadomasochistic undercurrent, amost literally sweating self-hatred, like something directly out of Fassbinder.

Malombra, Carmine Gallone, 1917

A film so much in awe of Lyda Borelli, it achieves a weird form of gestural hyperrealism, especially in the possession scenes.

Two Weeks in Another Town, Vincente Minnelli, 1963

Yes, everything is breaking down, the end of cinema is near, mostly because everyone is hopelessly set in his ways... but what makes this so great is the longing for things to be different, for one last, great synthesis.

Black Angel, Roy William Neill, 1946

Woolrich adaptation which sanitizes one of his greatest novels, but somehow manages to stay true to its spirit at least in parts. There's so much misplaced desire in Woolrich, some of it almost automatically manages to slip by. Still, as much as I love Duryea, the switch from the female to the male perspective is a shame.

Green Book, Peter Farrelly, 2018

A solid grounding in the performances of the two leads (there's a halfway decent sitcom premise in there, somewhere), but there's just nothing worth grounding here. Ok, I have to admit, I like the stuff with the love letters.

Aufbruch, Ludwig Wüst, 2018

Two people anchoring each other, in order to stay afloat, hovering above the abyss.

Thunderbolt, Josef von Sternberg, 1929

Not as perfect as DOCKS OF NEW YORK or MOROCCO - the transitions between scenes aren't particularly smooth in the first half and some of the supporting and bit actors talk as if they really only learned how to one year earlier. But it might still be my favorite Sternberg so far, for the prison sequence alone. And, of course, for George Bancroft's magnificent, extremely musical drawl.

Not that the first two big set pieces - at the night club and in the staircase, with Bancroft turning himself into a dog - aren't marvels in themselves, but only when arriving in prison, things really take off. Here, Sternberg constantly switches between a playful exploration of the possibilities of sound cinema (the warden's anger over the invisible, unbreakable prison quartett / greek chorus: no matter how often I break them up, there's always another singer coming in) and a carefully calibrated, tense suspense plot. We stay in one single cell almost the whole time, yet the cinematic space is constantly shrinking and expanding. And instead of finally letting one of these two moods take over, Sternberg pushes both to their respective limits in the last few minutes before the execution: Sternberg and Bancroft evoke, at the same time and in the same gestures, a sentimental, almost cheesy, laid-back attitude and a sense of terror which, in the end, reduces the whole world to the movements of Bancroft's hands.

"I wish there were a way of telling when a human being's out of tune."

The Adventurous Blonde, Frank McDonald, 1937

The plot is interesting in theory, but gets lost in endless, clumsy, Torchy-less exposition (after the first scene, she isn't in the film for ten whole minutes, which might not seem much on paper but feels like eternity). Even when she finally comes back, things are moving slower than usual. Tom Kennedy doesn't help much this time, either. Coasts by on Farrell's charms alone.

Monday, January 27, 2020

letterboxd backup (5)

Support the Girls, Andrew Bujalski, 2018

Almost everything I read about this is more about the author's views on capitalism than about Bujalski's competent, but bland film.

---

As an aside: SUPPORT THE GIRLS is no more anti-capitalism than COMPUTER CHESS is anti-nerd or RESULTS is anti-fitness. There's nothing in here to challenge even a hardcore laissez-faire, leave everything to the marketplace view. Not that I would want Bujalski to make an anti-capitalism film. Almost on the contrary: By using the obvious shittiness of Double Whammies as a dramaturgical shorthand, he takes the easy way out in almost every single scene. That being said, Haley Lu Richardson is very funny in this.

Blonde Crazy, Roy Del Ruth, 1931

Love is finding new reasons for slapping each other every day and enjoying each slap as it were the first one.

---

Bourgeois life as offscreen doom, a force of pure, unrepresentable inhibition encrouching on the loose, joyfull mise en scene from the outside.

---

The dissolves are marvellous. Gestures sinking into darkness.

Captured! Roy Del Ruth, 1933

1933, when showers in german prison camps still sprayed water. Even when discounting the eerie resemblance of quite a few shots to later holocaust iconography, the first ten minutes are surprisingly dark for a film like this. Collective despair devouring all hints of individual agency. The rest of the film doesn't live up to this at all, but although the main stroyline is rather contrived and both main actors feel out of place in almost every scene, the Warner imagemaking machine keeps up the pace nicely and the crowd scenes are always impressive. Plus there's a gay melodrama hidden in there, somewhere.

Sweet Country, Warwick Thornton, 2017

Racism not as a function of cultural difference or individual morality, but as a natural product of primitive accumulation of capital. Some of the interactions feel stilted and (despite the sparse dialogue) overarticulate, but as a historical-materialist western with a knack for abstract imagery this is pretty impressive.

The Indian Runner, Sean Penn, 1991

I mostly liked this, very much an early 90s film. Somehow american cinema has lost the ability since then to make downbeat middlebrow americana like this without coming off as totally condescending (Mortensen's showy performance is problematic at times, but it's balanced out by Morse and the solid as rock Bronson and Hopper). For a long time, even the small tonal missteps like Arquette's screams work in the film's favor, making it more alive. In the last 20 minutes it somehow derails comepletely, on every level, with Penn basically doubling down on every bad directorial decision, again and again. It starts with an ill-advised musical cue (Janis Joplin) and only gets down from there. It's almost as if seeing, in real time, a fine instinctual filmmaker giving in to his desperate attempts to say something.

Private Life, Tamara Jenkins, 2018

The children you don't have, the books you don't write, the feelings you can't articulate. Private life as an economy of lack, but on the other side there's Kathryn Hahn. (Regarding form I have similar objections to this than to 20TH CENTURY WOMEN, but here the "symphonic style" doesn't bother me as much, maybe because it's mostly played as comedy.)

Balangiga: Howling Wilderness, Khavn, 2017

Probably the closest Khavn will ever come to making a Lav Diaz film. Of cause, Diaz would never use a historical atrocities experienced through the eyes of a child narrative like this and for good reason. Not without its pictorial appeal (amazing just how many great philippine new wave films were shot by Albert Banzon) but in the end, Khavn loses most of his edge when he replaces madcap structuralism with only slightly off-kilter magic realism.
(Maybe all of this is unfair because the film is really, deeply sad.)

Crimson Tide, Tony Scott, 1995

Light as information vs light as expressivity. Or, as Frank Ramsey puts it: "I don't trust air I don't see."

It´s Boring Here, Pick Me Up, Ryuichi Hiroki, 2018

Pretty much blew me away. A fractured, caleidoscopic Letter from an Unknown Woman filtered through the spaces and textures of provincial Japan (Tokyo being near enough to provide a constant reminder of what life could also be like). Time is in a constant flux, glued together only by a continuity of unfullfilled desire (to love, to be loved, to be someone else). Music and melancholia.

Strange Cargo, Frank Borzage, 1940

Just another reason to prefer old hollywood: Never would Joan Crawford let anyone bully her into not wearing high heels while running through the jungle.

The Man I Married, Irving Pichel, 1940

Anti-fascism, Joan Bennett style: The more she's being pissed off by Nazi Germany, the stylisher her wardrobe gets. "Heil Heel!"

There is no real sense of dread and terror in this, but I liked the economical, matter of fact mise en scene, which doesn't fall prey at all to the allure of nazi aesthetics (especially obvious when contrasting it with the pompous, fetishistic newsreel footage the film uses in one scene). Pichel seems to have been mainly concerend with showing that nazis, whatever else they might be, are also a bunch of no-fun assholes. Which remains a valuable lesson, I guess.

Words, Planets, Laida Lertxundi, 2018

The laid-back, relaxed attitude evident in this might be exactly what i've been missing in most avantgarde films, contemporary or otherwise.

The Crime of Dr. Crespi, John H. Auer, 1935

Schlock horror masterpiece, closer in spirit to Hershell Gordon Lewis than to James Whale. The bare bone sets accentuate the weirdness of the close-ups - horror is very much a matter of physiognomy, here. Auer has no sense of narrative economy whatsoever, but THE CRIME OF DOCTOR CRESPI is all the better for it - this is just as much an observational film about von Stroheim's way of delicately smoking cigarettes and having drinks with his child skeleton companion than it is a dark horror tale about him drugging his colleague and burying him alive. Strangely enough, it manages to also be a workplace comedy about nurses, doctors and their reciprocal erotic projections.

Roi Soleil, Albert Serra, 2018

There's enough classicist (royalist?) beauty in the framings to keep my interest up, but prankster Serra clearly still isn't my favorite Serra.

When Strangers Marry, William Castle, 1944

Kim Hunter believes the improbable. And so can we, while watching this film, for 67 glorious, poetic minutes.

Io la conoscevo bene, Antonio Pietrangeli, 1965

You think this can't get any better and then Stefania Sandrelli starts controlling a record player with her foot.

The Falcon and the Co-eds, William Clemens, 1943

Tom Conway's falcon is swallowed up by female spaces and desires, just as the whodunit plot is swallowed up by lewtonesque somnambulism. And then the sea starts to talk.

---

The rear projection shot of the two women standing at the edge of the cliff at the end is just as great as the famous matte painting shot in BLACK NARCISSUS.

And Then There Were None, Rene Clair, 1945

I'm not invested in the field, but I wouldn't be surprised if this is the best of all Christie adaptations, as it perfectly captures the core of her prose - the always strangely bloodless sadism as well as the sense of prearranged fate, turning every new murder into a somewhat detached, opaque echo of an unknowable original sin.

"And Then There Were None" already is as meta as a Christie story can get, with her organizing the mechanics of death alongside a nursery rhyme (more precisely: a racist nursery rhyme - it's almost too easy to read the whole thing as a comment on the impeding downfall of Empire). In fact, the structure of the story is closer to a surrealistic game than to classic mystery fiction. And Clair's playful, not-quite-formalist style plays along with this, focusing on small absurdities (the keyhole sequence, the cat) instead of haunted house routines; while also fleshing out the characters enough to not letting this turn into an academic exercise. A shame Mischa Auer dies first, though.

The House on 56th Street, Robert Florey, 1933

68-minute epic by Florey, spanning generations and decades, from the "follies of 1905" to the rush hour of 1925 - the leap in time signaled by a miniature, two shot city symphony; Florey manages to sneak in at least tiny bits of his earlier avantgarde passion in almost all of his features. Indeed, despite its oldschool melodramatic structure, the film is constantly innovative. In the second half, almost all dramatic and character development is depicted through card games.

Of the three men Kay Francis is associated with over the course of the film, Gene Raymond, her "true love", clearly is the blandest. Which may have been intentional, as he basically functions as an empty on which she can project her desire for domesticity. Indeed, although their marriage doesn't take up more than a few minutes of screen time, it is handled especially beautiful. When Francis enters the nursery, the camera stays back for a moment, letting her discover this new world of domestic bliss (which she will, of course, never be able to enjoy) on her own terms.

Later, when she says goodbye to Raymond in prison, he cautiously reaches over the screen separating husband and wife from each other - not even with his whole hand, just with the cups of his fingers. She answers his gesture, he kisses her fingers timidly and freezes into an awkward, completely inhibited position while she walks away. She is in prison, but he is lost, because he has no existence outside of her.

The Gay Falcon, Irving Reis, 1941

Despite several deaths, the plot unfolds without anyone being even slightly disturbed by it. This isn't a film about a ring of jewel thiefs; strangely enough, it also isn't a film about George Sanders philandering. He is smooth and funny as always, but he just isn't given enough room on his own. In fact, he functions more like a master of ceremonies, as an elegant glue holding together a string of vignettes centered around the magificent supporting cast: Allen Jenkins bodily reacting to a pinball game; Wendy Barrie ("I hate men") staring down an innocent waiter, in fact almost picking on him like an angry bird; Nina Vale (a fascinating, irritating presence throughout) vigorously brushing her hair, as if fighting a private war; Hans Conried cultivating, in his short appearance as a police sketch painter, his very own, excentric brand of arrogance.

La proie du vent, Rene Clair, 1927

Well, the car chase is good. And the scene with the cigarettes is even better. I wonder why this isn't used more often: smoking not as fetish, but as a more direct expression of sexuality: the desire to enter another person's body.

Dead Man´s Eyes, Reginald Le Borg, 1944


Not as visually striking and inventive as the first two Inner-Sanctum-films, but this has a weird charme all of its own. A film about non-reciprocated desires and about the absolute helpnessness of people when confronted with them. A sticky, tangled web of jealousy, guilt, blindness and deceit, all played out with an air of stylish, cool detachment. The female cast isn't quite as spectacular as in WEIRD WOMAN (neither are the hairstyles), but Acquanetta is a fascinating, irritating presence throughout.

Roma, Alfonso Cuaron, 2018

A bit too showy in parts, but there's enough energy throughout, thanks to a strong, resonant core: Cuaron's awareness that the desire to recreate the world of his childhood is inseperable from the misfortune of those two women who created this world in the first place, at the expense of their own desires.

---

Most heartbreaking moment: Cleo wiping the telephone receiver on her dress before handing it over to her employer.

3 Faces, Jafar Panahi, 2018

The relationship of Panahi and Kiarostami remains intriguing: The more the student finds his own voice, the closer his films mirror the themes and methodology of his teacher.

Therese and Isabelle, Radley Metzger, 1968

L'Année dernière à Mädcheninternat.

In 3 Tagen bist Du tot, Andreas Prochaska, 2006

Competent genre routines set against decent non-acting, mid zeroes cultural artefacts (the last days of fun punk, the very last days of vhs, clunky mobile phones) and a spirit of decidedly mild intergenerational discord. It takes almost no effort to completely ignore the fussy driving instructor, the awkward provincial cop, the wheelchair-bound father. Unfortunately the Jeff Spinoli type guy (playing air guitar while his resigned mother cleans up around him) dies first.
Lively middle of the road stuff like this will always age better than at least 90% of the one-note ego trip art horror films celebrated by critics.

Friday, January 24, 2020

Nachäffen

Die letzte von doch nicht allzu vielen Filmbulletin-Ausgaben, für die ich mitverantwortlich war, ist ziemlich schön geworden, glaube ich. Zum Tierschwerpunkt habe ich einen Text zu Affenfilmen beigetragen, und erst jetzt fällt mir auf, dass ich da auch etwas über das Verb "nachäffen" hätte schreiben können, denn in gewisser Weise bringt das Wort auf den Punkt, was (oft) passiert, wenn ein Affe bzw ape suit vor der Kamera auftaucht. Das Nachäffen ist eine Wiederholung menschlichen Verhaltens, aber nicht als Kopie, sondern als Parodie und Verächtlichmachung. In der Veraffung wird etwas sichtbar - am Menschen. Das Äffische wird zum Interpretant des Menschlichen und das funktioniert nur, weil es, aller Ähnlichkeit zum Trotz, doch eine Differenz gibt zwischen beidem. Anders ausgedrückt: Im Kino äfft der Affe immer schon den Menschen nach. Der Affe ist also, als gefilmter, eine Kritik am Menschen, aber nicht weil er ein "unvollendeter" Mensch ist (das wäre die rassistische Variante der Affenmotivik, die sich das Kino zum Glück nur selten zu eigen macht), sondern weil er ein überdeutlicher Mensch ist.

letterboxd backup (4)

Three Godfathers, John Ford, 1948

My favorite part comes when, towards the end of the film, shortly before he arrives in this film's version of Jerusalem, John Wayne stumbles through a canyon, thirsty and depleted. As in other scenes before, exhaustion is treated not as a bodily condition but as a prerequistion for the state of grace. Wayne, however, doesn't fall into a soft, cloud-like death, but instead becomes something like a mad saint, he starts hallucinating, and the world around him transforms itself into a cinematic echo chamber, complete with ghost voices, superimpositions, and a donkey miracle. In a way, the whole film works like this: While Ford's other westerns of the period (probably even the intimate WAGON MASTER, which I'll have to revisit soon) are deeply invested in making sense of the emerging post war world, 3 GODFATHERS often feels like a private fantasy: John Ford, hanging out in his own cinematic echo chamber.

Of course this isn't a surprise, given that 3 GODFATHERS is a remake of Ford's own 1919 film MARKED MEN and also a tribute to its star, Harry Carey. The true miracle is that, despite its openly, even proudly anachronistic setup, the film never once feels claustrophobic. One reason for this might be, that the two main structural levels of the film - the genre exercise and the religious allegory - never completely collapse into each other. No matter how deliriously christian things get, Ford at the same time always stays true to the simple chase narrative (which twice in the film is sketched as a spatialized diagram). Thereby, 3 GODFATHERS permanently sidesteps the notion of mythical closure which always seems to lurk behind the next corner.

More important, probably, are single scenes, evelated shots which seem to come out of nowhere (the one with Wayne shielding his dying friend from the sun), singular intensities. This, more than the naive storyline, connects the film to early cinema, to the cinema of attractions. Of course, every single one of these moments is also a triumph of craft. The sandstorm, for example, is a triumph of Hollywood studio artifice, on par with the storm in THE HURRICANE. But the best special effect is much more basic: the baby itself, the faux christ found in the desert, and fed with cactus water. Each time the bundle in which the infant is wrapped in is opened, the film seems to discover the wonders of life anew, as if for the first time. Here, in the spiritual center of the film, glorious artifice suddenly breaks through into pure realism: The tiny hands grabbing Wayne's tanned, life-worn fingers, the mouth sucking, by way of pure reflex, on the improvised milk bottle.

The Long Gray Line, John Ford, 1955

When you watch the parade passing by you can't be part of it yourself. Not only a film about a life almost completely lived by proxy and the growing invisibility of history (in the age of cinemascope), but also about the specific melancholy of cinema.

Also: Maureen O'Hara as the last great silent movie comedian. Her love on first sight scene with Tyrone Powers might be one of the most beautiful slapstick routines ever.

The Other Sister, Garry Marshall, 1999

Whatever obscenity there might be in Lewis and Ribisi playing disabled characters is completely diminished by the objective obscenity of the uber-waspy upperclass setting. Not to speak of the obscenity of Marshall's musical cues.

This is (not unlike the other rather few Marshalls I've seen) a completely shameless film. But also an interesting one, with a lot of quirky ideas. The close-ups of isolated flying objects during the first wedding, the sex cutaway to the fish bowl (and brass music!), those friendly weirdos Ribisi meets during his getaway.

You probably need to be in tune with a certain kind of perversity to enjoy mainstream monstrosities like this. But, well, I certainly am.

Sergeant Rutledge, John Ford, 1960

One detail in the train scene early in the film: While getting to know each other, Constance Towers's Mary and Jeffrey Hunter's Tom are standing in the middle of one of the compartments of this rather un-trainlike looking train. They are facing each other while being aligned perpendicular towards the direction and movement of the machine. When the train suddenly breaks they should, according to the laws of physics, stumble parallel to the movement of the train, and also parallel to each other. However, they stumble towards each other instead, resulting in Mary falling into Tom's arms.

On the one hand this is a precise definition of movie magic: Cinema has the power to alter ficticious force, to refract it by 90 degrees (these 90 degrees might also be thought of as the romantic bias of cinema). On the other hand, the very strangeness and exposed antinaturalism of the scene fits this particular film perfectly. In SERGEANT RUTLEDGE, the chains of cause and effect aren't exactly broken, but they work in peculiar, almost absurd ways. The extremely beautiful, and despite its strangeness extremely moving film is first and foremost concerned with celebrating and mythologizing the „buffalo soldier“, with inscribing the faces of black americans on the iconography and texture of the hollywood western / of Ford's cinema... but it does this through a convoluted, meandering plot, structured around an investigation which, for most of the film's running time, seems to move not towards, but away from the crime it is supposed to solve. Only to be thrust back to it in the end by way of a rather bizarre deus ex machina development, resulting in an almost ecstatically overacted confession scene.

Viva, Anna Biller, 2007

Rewatching Biller's films on film makes me ecstatic and sad at the same time. Ecstatic for obvious reasons, sad because I realize that there are no real reasons (only fucking pragmatic ones) for the switch to digital. All films could look like this one! And especially: All filmed bodies could look like the ones in VIVA, completely exposed and yet protected by a material gaze affectionately registering their uniqueness.

Dawn of the Dead, George A. Romero, 1978

Argento cut. Which feels less different than I thought it would. But altogether, the changes do amount to a certain streamlining.

Storia di Piera, Marco Ferreri, 1983

A film in which Hanna Schygulla fights off ten (!) rapists with a hammer and which also has Isabelle Huppert doing weird pantomime / facial tick stuff has no right to be that much of a drag in almost all other scenes.

The Return of Mr. Moto, Ernest Morris, 1965

To shoot 1965, in the age of Bond, a bare-bones, 70 minutes, black and white Mr. Moto film is obviously a rather crazy idea, especially with a main actor who is almost the polar opposite of Peter Lorre both physically and in terms of flexibility. Still, for the first ten minutes, consisting mostly of a minimalist, almost abstract chase scene, manic closeups lost in empty studio space, I thought this might be an accidental masterpiece. When the plot mechanics kick in, the limitations of the everyone involved (and especially of the budget) become obvious, but the film never quite loses its strange, somnambulic charme.

A Song to Remember, Charles Vidor, 1955

It's easy to understand why Ayn Rand hated this: the George Sand character easily could've been based on herself (or rather, her public image), not only in terms of her philiosophy, but also in terms of her lifestyle. The film's repudiation of Sand / Rand in the end, in favour of Paul Muni's fuzzy populism, clearly and quite openly not only targets (in a problematic way, to say the least, although one has to remember that this was produced during World War 2) Rand's hyperbolic individualism, but also this very anti-bourgeois lifestyle. Which is, once again quite openly, alligned with feminism, if not the female experience per se. Muni's character also targets style per se: Oberlon's always extremely well-dressed Sand is the only colourful, extravagant element in an otherwise drab colour palette. Without her, this wouldn't even be a technicolor film!

In the end, Rand's dismissal of the film might be completely wrongheaded (and pointing to her not really having a sense of humour). Oberlon / Sand / Rand might lose the battle for Chopin's heart and life, but she clearly wins the mise en scene.

Red Sparrow, Francis Lawrence, 2018

Comes alive for a precious few minutes during Mary-Louise Parker's unhinged drunk performance. Jennifer Lawrence's performance is all right, but feels too conceptual. The rest is either too stupid or not stupid enough. On a side note: minor stylists like Francis Lawrence seem to have been hit the hardest by the switch to digital. Everything's way too clean and static, like a barely animated storyboard. Style has been replaced by the idea of style.

Allonsanfan, Taviani brothers, 1974

The desire to dance together is the death of revolution. The yearning for an imaginary wholeness, for a magical becoming one with the revolutionary subject will lead bourgeois idealists into doom. This is such a powerful rejection of leftist romanticism (and probably one of the most thought-through post-68 films), because it evokes its very textures: a world almost entirely made up of homosocial camaraderie, rousing music, color cues, proud but sexy and willing women.

Of course, for the Tavianis in 1974 this systematic denunciation of leftist naivete wasn't an end in itself, but pointed towards a more analytical marxist perspective. When the security of an all-encompassing macro-perspective like that is gone, too, the film suddenly feels much more bitter...

What is left today is still not pure cynicism, though, but a fascinating film constantly switching between conceptual denseness and a more loose, novelistic tone. Only the protagonist himself feels a little overwrote sometimes - Mastroianni doesn't need all this psychological and sociological burden, he works best, when he is just a soft cypher, a vaguely incongruous, overwhelmed body thrown into history. Because he so clearly is someone not made to fight, but to be petted, adored and caressed.

Watching ALLONSANFAN today is a nostalgic experience. What I'm longing for isn't the politics of the 70s, though, but a time when aesthtics still could be mobilized, more or less wholesale, for abstract ideas.

Tonight or Never, Mervyn LeRoy, 1931

Just another proof that the early 30s were the most glorious era in film history. As if cinema, in a few years, invented all of its forms once again, but not from scratch, but driven by an already established belief in the power of the medium.

TONIGHT OR NEVER is, to me, the perfect meshing of precode sexiness and silent movie sensuality. Gloria Swanson is finally able to verbalize her desires, but she still has ample room to act it out through gestures and glances, too. The way she caresses furniture... This must be an axiom of cinema: put Gloria Swanson on a sofa and something magical will happen.

The film is also proof of LeRoys supreme craftmanship. To pull of, so early in his career, a film like this, so different in tone and especially rhythm than the stuff he did at Warner Brothers at the time, shows that his films are much more than the products of their environment. Although he made just a handful of silents (I haven't been able to see a single one, so far), he manages to make TONIGHT OR NEVER look like the work of a silent master creatively retooling his work for the sound era. The cigarette butts under Swanson's window, a few Lubitsch-style cascades of movements and gazes, and, of course, Swanson's acting... Melvyn Douglas is also already pretty lubitschy.

At the same time, certain limitations are obvious, too, especially in some of the more lightweigh Warner comedies: LeRoy never tries to overcome weaknesses in the script, he always chooses to work around them instead, investing his energy in the stuff that interests him. In his lesser films, this results in piecemeal, but never completely uninspired work.

Here, the main problem is the rather stupid resoultion. Although in a way even the clumsy ending (the somewhat unearned forming of the couple) is interesting, because it lays open a tension in the script between the older narrative of romantic conquest the film still sticks to, and the emerging, more egalitarian form of the remarriage comedy.

Five Star Final, Mervyn LeRoy, 1931

Edgar G. Robinson as a hard-nosed, but in the end of course only almost completely cynical newspaperman trying to cash in on a long-forgotten murder. The temporal difference is essential, because this basically is two films in one: On the one hand, a decidedly modern thriller-as-farce about capitalist pressure in the world of mass media (and the psychological side-effects which go along with it). On the other hand, a 19th century melodrama about a woman`s tarnished reputation.

LeRoy doesn`t try to bridge the gap, instead, he accentuates it. The fluid, fast-talking newspaper scenes form a harsh contrast to the theatrical, almost a bit zombie-like scenes set at the home of the "tarnished woman". Interestingly, the only link between both worlds is Karloff - who is, not at all surprisingly, much more believable as the faux priest of victorian melodrama than as the supposedly authentic nihilist reporter T. Vernon Isopod (the name alone… so many beautiful details in this).

One might take this sensationalist defense of journalistic ethics as just another example of commercial cinema having its cake and eating it, too. But LeRoy is much more interested in structure, gadgets (the split-screen scene!) and runaway performances (George E. Stone! One of those actors who only need five minutes) than in morals. Plus, if nothing else, the theme of female solidarity rings true, like so often in his films. In the end, the true center of the film isn`t Robinson, but Aline MacMahon (in her first role!), in charge of the newspaper phone lines, throwing knowing looks at everyone who enters the scene. She's the one introspective, reflexive element in a world otherwise completely made up of manic, selfish activity.

Show Girl in Hollywood, Mervyn LeRoy, 1930

I`m still not sure quite how much and why I like Alice White, but she does have a supreme sense of style and one thing I do adore even more is her dancing. Her elegant, but relaxed, almost a bit negligent movements are far removed from the athletic style of precision dancing which dominants most american musicals. White`s dancing always feels like a by-product of her subjectivity first, and part of a choreography second (if at all).

The third of LeRoy`s Alice-White-films I`ve seen. Another making-it-in-show-business-plot, but this time set in early talkies Hollywood (complete with cameos by Al Jolson and Loretta Young), and much more ambitious. LeRoy manages to squeeze every part of film production, from casting to editing, into this (there`s even a scene set in a projection room), and especially the scenes at the producer`s office are pitch perfect. The mechanics of yes-manism.

While the loss of the technicolor version is a shame (the last reel feels static today, because the colors where supposed to provide the movement), there are so many other great and strange ideas in this, starting with the back projection tourist-bus ride when White enters Hollywood for the first time (shades of Lupino`s THE BIGAMIST; LeRoy himself uses the same idea in THE WORLD CHANGES). Another great bit is the guy who scratches the names off the office doors of fired studio employees, at the same time blotting out a career and all other voices on the sound track.

And then there`s Griffith actress Blanche Sweet as a "aging" (33 years old) former star who forms a bond with White`s newcomer. Female friendship is one of the main themes in LeRoys early films, and it`s never just a given, but it has to be tested, and in can be lost, as it almost happens here. The Sweet storyline basically is a film in itself, a rousing, bitter mini melodrama which puts SUNSET BOULEVARD to shame and comes complete with over-the-top silent movie acting and tear-eyed chiaroscuro. The greatest moment of the film, though, comes, when during the first long conversation of both women, Sweet suddenly starts to sing. Not only is something like this completely out of the ordinary in the backstage musicals of the time, but the singing has nothing to do with showmanship, but stays completely true to character as an effort of resigned, graceful self-expression. A truly magical moment.

Disco Fieber, Hubert Frank, 1979

Hubert Frank's gloriously delirious DISCO FIEBER is the german GOLD DIGGERS OF 1933. Or at least, the closest german cinema could ever, after germany's own 1933, come to GOLD DIGGERS OF 1933. When GOLD DIGGERS can be described as a film which acknowledes the reality of the depression, and by way of this very acknowledgement somehow overcomes it, DISCO FIEBER manages to do the same with and for (west-)german provinciality.

And it does so, again just like GOLD DIGGERS, by way of a textual bifurcation. For the most part, the film plays out like a standard, juvenile sex farce of the time, chronicling the escapades of a few wannabe-studs who try out gestures and chat-up-lines taken more or less directly from american youth films (LEMON POPSICLE clearly was a big influence, too). The jokes are stale and the slapstick-hide-in-the-closet-the-nuns-are-coming-routines are even staler, but that doesn't matter, because it's all about attitude, anyway, about celebrating the art of carelessly entering the classroom, about slouching on the bench with buttoned-downed shirts, about the right amount of disgracing oneself in an agreeable way.

Most of this works perfectly, despite itself. By now, Hubert Frank is, without a doubt, my favorite german sexploitation director. He may not be as distinctive as Jürgen Enz, as unconditionally perverted as Hans Billian, as rigorous a stylist as Ernst Hofbauer, but he is the most inspired of them all. Frank may just be the only truly instinctive filmmaker of German erotic cinema. He finds something special in every single scene. The low angles he uses for a football game, the way he glamourizes a female teacher, a bizarro dance montage involving several disguises, magnificent sport cars popping up out of nowhere in southern german no-man's-land - this is a film thoroughly infused with pleasures of the cheap, but powerful kind.

Frank's films always have charme and style, even when, or maybe especially when he has next to nothing to start from - like in this case: a film structured around Boney M, but without Boney M actually showing up on set for principal photography. When they do appear, they inhabit not only a different space than the rest of the cast, but a different layer of reality, and indeed a different medium: all the scenes with Boney M and other Frank Farian acts were shot by Klaus Überall (the name itself is a hint: "überall" is german for "everywhere") - on video.

These music video-like performances are the real piece du resistance of DISCO FIEBER, and also the sequences which align the film once and for all with GOLD DIGGERS OF 1933. Just like Berkeley's exuberant production designs and body sculptures in motion, Überall's crude video intrusions (complete with oldschool video effects - miniature people dancing on their own hands, whispering in their own ears) transcend the diegetic space in order to become objects of pure cinema. And, just like in GOLD DIGGERS, it's impossible to decide if these intrusions of the musical-spectacular represent the inner truth of the more prosaic world the rest of the film inhabits, or pure, unreachable externality.

I Spy, Allan Dwan, 1934

Not nearly good enough to be the missing link between A MODERN MUSKETEER and TRAIL OF THE VIGILANTES, but it is in the same vein: an absurdist, fast-moving comedy informed by the kind of popcultural knowingness and ironic detachement usually attributed to postmodernism. Dwan is perfectly suited for material like this - it's all about engineering and when he manages to boil down the story to pure mechanics (Ben Lyon bouncing around between two tough guys in one moment, and basically being thrown into an airplane into the next), it works beautifully. Some parts of it have a nice silent comedy feel to it and Lyon gives a wonderful deadpan performance. There is enough energy here, but not quite enough ideas to sustain it for 62 minutes.

Die Sexabenteuer der drei Musketiere, Erwin C. Dietrich, 1971

A succession of atrocious sex jokes, filmed as awkwardly (and slowly) as possible. the complete absence of even the faintest notion of craft leaves room, though, not only for formalist humour (the repeated pans over pastoral landscapes), but also for a number of small beauties: a man almost elegantly sliding into a duel scene because the floor is slippery, the lingering shot of a woman stretched out in the hay a few feet apart from a pining, but inactive man, several naked men walking in line through a dark, vaguely medieval room, trying way too hard to coordinate their movements. the one really beautiful scene that somehow managed to slip in - involving a frog sitting on ingrid steeger's breast - is worth more than anything someone like Inarritu has ever done. the dialectics of film history.

Hannah Gadsby: Nanette, 2018

While I don't particularly like this as stand-up, I know that reactions to performances like this are highly subjective, and NANETTE sure is a neat piece of storytelling and audience control, so the rating is more about its reception than about the thing itself. I just don't buy into the idea that something which triggers dozens of almost identical think pieces in just a few weeks can be a "watershed moment" or a "game changer". The vocabulary to describe this obviously already was there, as this is, point for point, tailor-made for its think piece producing target audience. Anyway, burdening popular culture with promises of salvation (while rejecting its most interesting part: its paradoxes) almost always is a bad idea.

Admittedly I'm a big fan of stand-up without actually having experienced a lot of it. But still I think it isn't a big risk to claim that a random evening in a headliner-free NYC comedy club contains more friction and energy than this.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, J. A. Bayona, 2018

I enjoyed FALLEN KINGDOM more than I thought I would, but its pleasures are completely detached from the core of the film series. I was completely on board with all scenes involving Maisie. A girl of unnatural ancestry, unloved by humans and surrounded by strange beasts, exploring (and conquering) her hostile and baroque surroundings by means of the service elevator - I can't think of many characters in big budget films over the last ten years who are even remotely as interesting as Maisie. In a few scenes, Bayona manages to create a style of heighened artificiality (I especially liked the strange color burst in the museum scene) which fits her storyline perfectly.

In theory, it might be possible to combine Maisie's adventures with big budget dinosaur mayhem in a meaningful way. However, in this regard the film just feels tired. First and foremost, FALLEN KINGDOM desperately needed at least one or two stand-out open-air set pieces. Instead, the film spends way too much time in a generic underground facility (and doesn't even manage to evoke a sense of claustrophobia; the action really is a letdown, even compared with Trevorrow's film).

One scene encapsulating my frustration: After some inventive shadowplay in Maisies bedroom, threatening, ancient Jaws crawl near the frightened girl - and then Chris Pratt busts through the door and starts blasting away in the most prosaic manner. Pratt himself isn't as annoying as in JURASSIC WORLD, but just as boring. While Bryce Dallas Howard - clearly, whether you like her role or not, the most interesting part of the first film - has almost nothing to do. Same goes for most of the new cast members. It's really all about Maisie, this time.

Fascination Amour, Herman Yau, 1999

For once, one of these choice-moments-of-a-love-story-set-to-a-pop-tune montage sequences, ubiquitous in hong kong cinema, does make sense - because the film preceding it feels so disjointed and slapdash that I really was surprised to rediscover the solid thread of memorable, intimate scenes running through it. My favorite moment: Andy Lau histrionically slouching away from the camera and from Hikari Ishida, after being accused by his boss of being a playboy,

The first part is a bare-bones romantic comedy (the hot-tub scene is good) set on a luxury vessel with Hotel Bonaventure style postmodern interiors. There are so many allusions to TITANIC that, at one point, I really was waiting for the iceberg to appear. But obviously even the most basic of shipwreck scenes would have exceeded the budget tenfold. Therefore, Lau and Ishida spend the second half in Puerto Rico. Here, the film falls apart completely while at the same time becoming more interesting. There are two extended, borderline surrealistic street dancing scenes and the considerable charms of the two leads have more opportunities to shine through the chaos.

So there's life after all, even though, ultimately, this is one of the rather few Herman Yau projects which were indeed beyond saving.

The First Auto, Roy Del Ruth, 1927

A gimmick film. Not only is it chock full of gimmicks, but it's also, in a way, about a society enthralled by gimmicks. About a society encountering modernity in the form of gimmicks. Maybe also about the gimmicky nature of modernity in general. A film about people constantly trying to showcase something or other, to attract attention to something, to play tricks on each other. The introduction of the car is just a convenient occasion to free one's inner narcissistic showman. Fortunately, the basic mood is still optimistic, even hedonistical. Progress is a given, something which is about to happen anyway, so we might just enjoy it.

The gimmicks really take over (almost) everything. There filmic realisation stems from Del Ruth's Sennett days (i just encountered a variation of the joke with the funnel in his THE HEART SNATCHER), and the technologically newer sound effects are used just in the same way: A laughter, applause and even single words are used as distinct gimmicks vamping up the otherwise silent image. Some of the effects are truly astonishing, especially a series of different, stylized voices used to depict town chatter. It's a pity this transitional phase didn't last longer (and, of course, that most of the films produced with sound effects are lost).

There's also an old man who doesn't believe in gimmicks. He sticks to his horse, an animal which almost automatically triggers, with each of its appearances, a mode of melodrama completely absent from the rest of the film, because it clearly belongs to an older era. The last shot belongs not to the car, but to the horse - which has been transformed into a kind of sentimental gimmick. So in a way, this is also a film about the invention of nostalgia. Vernacular dialectics.

Drunken Tai-Chi, Yuen Woo-ping, 1984

The only small problem might be that DRUNKEN TAI CHI climaxes rather early - there's just no way to top the magnificent fireworks scene. After that, the film settles for a parade of smaller scale set pieces, all of them performed with a lot of energy, directed with speed and inventiveness and infused with the right kind of vulgarity. The narrative is threadbare and by the numbers but treated with enough respect and attention to detail (the repercussions of the great Lydia Shum fight scene, the domestic dynamics between Shum and Yuen and so on) to keep a base level of interest in the characters.

The 80s electro beats and allusions to basketball and breakdance add an extra level of craziness, but in a way the crosscultural spectacle feels completely natural, probably because the youthful Donnie Yen really is a force of nature in this film, transforming every impuls into movement, instantly and without discrimination. Still, my personal highlight in the cast is Yuen Shun-Yee with another really out-there bad-guy-performance (he may even function as some sort of auteurist signature in his brother's films). Just like in DREADNAUGHT, he displays a fundamental, grotesque oddity which reaches far beyond the usual villain routines by tapping into a source of private craziness. Which in this case somehow is connected to him being a really great, loving dad. The scene in which he assembles a decidedly weird-looking hobby horse by pounding in the nails with his bare flesh is the kind of throwaway greatness only 80s Hong Kong cinema can provide. I will never get tired of stuff like this.

Friday, January 17, 2020

Ein Buch des letzten Sommers: Niemand ist eine Insel von Johannes Mario Simmel

"Wie würden die deutschen Kritiker mich bestenfalls etikettieren?" fragte ich.
"Als einen vor nichts, aber auch vor gar nichts zurückschreckenden Trivialautor", sagte Ruth Reinhardt.

Simmel schreckt vor nichts, aber auch vor gar nichts zurück, nur dauert es eine Weile, bis man das merkt, beziehungsweise bis man merkt, was das bedeutet. Die ersten paar Kapitel sind langsam und ausgesprochen geschwätzig. Eine Ambulanz fährt durch Paris in Richtung Krankenhaus, es geht um Leben und Tod, aber sie kommt trotzdem höchstens mit zwei Minuten pro Seite voran, der Erzähler lässt sich von allem und jedem ablenken, eine Beschreibung, Seitenbemerkung, Charakterisierung jagt die nächste. Vielleicht geht es darum, uns einzuüben in eine Prosa, die zu allem und jedem etwas zu sagen und eine Meinung hat.

Nach 50, 60 Seiten nimmt die Erzählung Fahrt auf und ist fortan nicht mehr zu stoppen. Kein Wunder, es geht schließlich um viel. Simmel hat das Buch geschrieben, das ist auf der ersten Seite zu lesen, um auf das Leid behinderter Kinder aufmerksam zu machen, auf die Schwächsten der Schwachen. Das klappt nur, in sich ist das schon logisch, wenn man keine Hemmungen kennt.

Es geht also um behinderte Kinder, der Erzählbarkeit zuliebe erst einmal nur um eines, das ist dann allerdings nicht irgendeines, sondern die Tochter der schönsten Frau und populärsten Schauspielerin der Welt, einer Diva sondergleichen, von der außerdem eine Tonbandaufnahme existiert, auf der zu hören ist, wie sie - damals war ihre Tochter noch gesund - über, ausgerechnet, behinderte Kinder herzieht. Mit dieser Aufnahme wird sie jetzt erpresst, während sie in Cinecitta an einem neuen Film arbeitet, einer Adaption von Brechts "Der kaukasische Kreidekreis", die sich in Simmels Beschreibung absolut fürchterlich liest, aber natürlich zum erfolgreichsten Film aller Zeiten avanciert, noch vor Gone With the Wind und Star Wars. Das ist erst der Anfang. Später wird der Plot, nur unter anderem, mit einer Reihe von Doppelgängern angereichert und das Ganze endet, wunderbarerweise, in einer Nürnberger Bahnhofsabsteige, wo der nimmermüde Simmel auf den letzten Seiten eine der besten Figuren des Films aus dem Hut zaubert, eine geradezu exaltiert ordinäre, breit fränkelnde Prostituierte.

Simmel ist ein Überzeugungstäter des Trivialen. Wie Til Schweiger vielleicht, aber umfassender interessiert an der Welt und vor allem technisch besser. Nach dem zähen Krankenwagenstart wird das Buch zum waschechten page turner, perfekt montiert ist es vor allem, Cliffhanger, Ellipsen, Rückblenden, alles sitzt. Der Exzess an Geschwätzigkeit und Meinung zu allem und jedem ist bald schon kein Ballast mehr, sondern Gleitmittel. Ab und an schwingt sich Simmel gar zu Miniaturen romantischer Poesie auf, insbesondere dann, wenn er das Loblied singt auf diejenigen, die im Dunkeln gutes Tun und keinen Dank dafür erwarten.

Die im Dunkeln, die im Hellen. Das verweist einerseits wieder auf die Doppelgängermotivik, andererseits auf die Abgründigkeit der Prosa. Denn die Erzählperspektive ist von Anfang an und rettungslos schief: Der da schreibt, das ist der Geliebte der Schauspielerin, ein Frauenheld und Taugenichts, der sie nicht liebt und nur an ihrem Geld interessiert ist. Der Erzähler selbst ist moralisch korrupt und er weiß es auch. Er weiß sogar, dass seine moralische Korruption die Prosa mitkorrumpiert, und er schreibt an einer Stelle, dass nur manchmal, ab und an, ein paar Zeilen lang, eine andere, bessere, echtere Prosa durch die falsche hindurchschimmern wird. Die Welt der Guten und Wahren bleibt ansonsten im Dunkeln, während er selbst die Welt der Schlechten und Falschen hell erstrahlen lassen wird, Satz für Satz, Seite für Seite.

Thursday, January 16, 2020

letterboxd backup (3)

Große Freiheit Nr. 7, Helmut Käutner, 1944

A man's passion done in by automaton love. But he himself is part of the automaton world, he just doesn't want to admit it (to himself, first and foremost). Hans Albers as Hannes Kröger still thinks of himself as king of the high seas, although he's been stranded in St. Pauli's red-light version of the cultural industry for quite a while. Right at the beginning the mighty four-master is exchanged with a ship in a bottle. When in the end he reenters the world of seafaring, this doesn't feel like liberation, but rather like his giving in to an imaginary solution.

The melodrama in between never settles down on a constant tone; for all its musical and cinematographical brilliance (lightning and make-up turning Albers' face into a mask, transforming him into the most uncanny of the film's many automatons) it's first and foremost driven by gestures. Hilde Hildebrand leaning over the counter with the beer tap pressing into her chest; the automaton lover Hans Söhnker absentmindedly stroking the handrail while waiting for Ilse Werner, his automaton girlfriend; Werner squeezing the automaton egg between her hands, while holding it up over her head, creating a personal world of her own in just one single, simple shot.

Lac aux dames, Marc Allegret, 1935

A Ritrovato moment to stay with me for a long time, probably: Simone Simon and Jean-Pierre Aumont rolling around in a barn, bedded on a pile of grain, joined in a flowing movement of not-quite-lovemaking, which somehow is even more erotic than actual sex. All scenes with Simon's Puck and Aumont's Eric in the barn (a magic fairytale wonderland which might also be a fishing lodge) are absolutely marvellous, elevating an already freewheeling, joyfully frivolous youth melodrama into pure cine-ecstasy.

LAC AUX DAMES is a film of unpretentious, un-selfconscious, but at the same time completely unhinged extravagance. Aumont - who's a swimming teacher working at a strange, almost sci-fi-like public bath - isn't caught between, but both blessed and marked by three women: Or maybe it's one woman split in three, into the imaginary (Simon), the symbolic (Rosin Derean), and the real (Illa Meery). But that's just one among several possible layers, and Aumont himself is more spirit than human most of the time in this.

Les amours de minuit, Augusto Genina, Marc Allegret, 1931

Two escaped men meet on a train. One - young, nervous, curious - escaped from his boring day job, the other - lean, lanky, sleazy - from a penal colony. The train would bring the young guy directly to the harbour and to his ship bound for South America. The other one persuades him to dismount one stop earlier by promising him a night in town with lots of erotic attractions. For the young man, the train is transformed from a mere means of transportation into a machine that grants worlds, options, adventures. A sense of anarchic, but also modernist freedom which for me is strongly associated with early sound cinema, right now my favorite period in film history - by far.

The storyline might be rather straightforward, but the film isn't really interested in plot mechanics. Every scene is self-sufficent, every place a whole world in itself. Especially the nightclub: Several dance routines are filmed in their entirety, the buzz of the place is, for the most part, much more important than the conspiracy the young man might be caught in. A beautiful tracking shot floating alongside the bar counter: in the first row, men and a few women eating sanwiches, drinking beer; but there's a second row, comprised almost exclusively by women trying to snatch a quick bite or a drink for free.

Another great moment: the other guy, the bad, lanky one, and his mistress meeting in a revolving door. Her slight hesitation in joining him in the inside - her realizing that instead of meeting him she could just succumb to the dynamics of the door, rotate with it and get thrown out into the world.

By Candlelight, James Whale, 1933

At the same time true to its stage play source and completely cinematic, especially in its use of doors as sluices controlling both visual spectacle and erotic energy. The master / servant dynamic is very funny, especially because of Paul Lukas's natural air of superiority towards his boss, but like the magnificent THE KISS BEFORE THE MIRROR, this is ultimately all about learning / unlearning the automatisms of romance. Although this time around it's set in a much lighter mood.

The key to the film (and to Whale's authorship) might be the only scene not set in enclosed space, though: a short sequence at a country fair. While I still don't really know what to make of these strange images, one thing is clear: no one could mistake them for "good honest people having fun". Instead (and completely unrelated to the plot) they have a ritualistic feel about them. The most important element of Whale's fair are clearly the masks. And the reason for the strangeness of the scene might be that the usual links between mask and identity do not apply. The people neither wear masks to hide their (real) identity, nor to reveale their (true) self. Rather, masking is a state of being in its own right, a sign of pure difference, free from all (bodily, social, sexual) restraints.

Jet Pilot, Josef von Sternberg, 1957

so it turns out technicolor has the power to turn sternberg into tex avery.

Phenomena, Dario Argento, 1985

ontogeny vs phylogeny. phylogeny wins.

The Comedy of Terrors, Jacques Tourneur, 1963

only peter lorre's and the cat's dignity aren't completely shattered to pieces in the end.

Exectutioners from Shaolin, Lau Kar-Leung, 1976

I don't know why I never watched a Liu kung-fu film except for 36 CHAMBERS. Maybe I unconciously held back until I was ready. EXECUTIONERS immediately won me over, not only because its Bazinian approach to action (coupled with a magnificent use of the zoom lens), but also because of its organic feel. A world, in which every thought, every impuls is immediatly translated into choreographed physical movement. Also a world which is thoroughly sexualized, but somehow never in an obscene way. In the end, everything comes down to the (dialectically mediated) opposition of clenching one's own thighs vs kicking someone else's balls.

Hiroshima 28, Patrick Lung Kong, 1974

A Hongkong film set exclusively in Japan, and telling an almost exclusively Japanese story with only one chinese character: a reporter interested in learning about the legacy of the atomic bomb dropped over Hiroshima in 1945. Patrick Lung plays this soft-spoken reporter himself, signaling his personal commitment to the humanist venture the film is clearly ment to be. The main part of HIROSHIMA 28, however, consists of a dense family melodrama centered around two young women brought up as sisters which starts of somber and quiet but grows a lot more hysterical over time. (Spurred on by the dynamics of the interplay between the two main actresses - my favorite moment is energetic Maggie Li's long, slender fingers elegantly grabbing somnambul Josephine Siao's lunch).

On the macro level, the diverging ambitions of the film aren't all that well integrated on first sight with didactic sequences set at memorial sites repetedly interrupting the flow of melodrama. But in the end, the film manages to extract an essence of pure (and in the final analysis amoral) negativity from both strands of its story, with the furious conclusion of the melodrama somehow mirroring the harrowing flashback sequence at the beginning of the film - two outbursts of cinematic excess bracketing a story about fragile normalcy haunted by death.

Face, Tsai Ming Liang, 2009

A film that realizes that the statement "everyone's an artist" doesn't constitute a promise but a threat, or rather a curse, because it means that in the end everyone's hidden in the echo-chamber of his or her own artmaking. (Which explains why the scenes with Leaud are the film's strongest parts: he has both the biggest echochamber and the least restraint in making use of it.) It also means that in the end, sex is just another performance piece.

Also: A film that insists that art is completely outside of communication - fine with me in theory, but in this case I didn't understand the necessity to point out this incompatibility again and again. FACE is probably a logical endpoint for Tsai's cinema, and yet for me it's clearly his worst film. The visuals are imaginative as always but they just don't resonate as much as in the rest of his work. (I have similar problems with Hou's FLIGHT OF THE RED BALLOON; weird that the worst film of both directors was produced by Parisian museums).

Heaven and Hell, Chang Cheh, 1980

Not really a surprise that Chang Cheh would come up with only the flimsiest, cheesiest version of heaven, but with an eclectic, awesome, ornamental vision of hell. Still, I guess what I like best about this are the moments of irreverent pop art craziness barging in at odd moments, as if from a completely different film.

Il bacio di Tosca, Daniel Schmid, 1985

A film not about love, but of love, filming love as if it's a visible object.

The Flying Guillotine, Ho Meng-Hua, 1975

Even the birth of the hero's son is crosscut with not one but two flying guillotine beheadings. My kind of high concept film.

Circle of Danger, Jacques Tourneur, 1951

It's not surprising that CIRCLE OF DANGER is generally regarded as minor Tourneur because, at first glance, it's hardly more than an elongated, but not very elaborate, and finally rather pointless practical joke about a dull guy failing to avenge his brother despite trying terribly hard; and at the same time winning over a woman despite basically not even really trying.

Still, I'm completely in love with this strange little film. Ray Milland's dullness undermines the mystery plot from the start, yes, but this works for the film's advantage, because it allows for a not really disinterested, but in a way touristy gaze on all the odd details Tourneur assembles. Every character Milland meets carries his own little world around with him/herself, and although the stubborn protagonist doesn't notice this, remaining stuck in the past instead, Tourneur's camera is always attentive, in a quiet, controlled way. And when Milland finally gets together with Patricia Roc in the last scene (after the mystery plot, and with it the last gasps of the agency of the hero, vanishes in pure geometry), it's made clear that this isn't about him conquering her, but about her choosing him.

Les sept déserteurs ou La guerre en vrac, Paul Vecchiali, 2017

There's not a single soldier in sight in LES SEPT DESERTEURS AU LA GUERRE EN VRAC, and still it makes sense that Paul Vecchiali dedicates his film to, among others, Fuller and Wellman, the masters of the combat film. Because his film, like theirs, also uses war primarily as a mechanism of self-revelation through isolation. In Vecchiali's case, the war remains unnamed, and it takes place, in a very strict sense, outside the frame, and also (almost constantly) on the soundtrack, but never in the image itself. War can be told and heard, but never seen. Stray bullets may penetrate the frame and even kill the characters, but they never leave a visible trace on the actors, thereby delimiting another threshhold important for the film: between actor and character.

In a way, Vecchiali is even more serious about this seperation than Brechtian filmmakers like Straub / Huillet who always insist on the firstness of the performance and the profilmic. Because with Vecchiali it's not about priviledging the one (the actor / signifier) over the other (the character / signified), but about the co-existence of two realms: LES SEPT DESERTEURS is at the same time a gathering of seven actors, who meet on a single outdoor set supplemented by a handful of cleverly designed props, and are called up, first one by one, than in small, shifiting groups, to perform small acts, most of them very loosely structured around sex and death and all of them performed in a decidedly joyful, irreverent way, highlighting with proud stubbornness personal idiosyncrasies, especially in artfully stylized manners of speaking; and a film about a group of deserters and outcasts trying to escape from an omnipresents war. At least until the strange, magnificent last twist, there isn't a single rift between these two realms, as they are at the same time connected and seperated by the act of playing, which always involves a literal, materialist and a symbolic aspect.

The Crazies, George A. Romero, 1973

There are just two possible outcomes to the infection: death or eternal craziness. The only problem is that among all the people dying in the film, almost no one dies from the disease. And literally everyone is acting crazy, one way or another. But of course, the harder it becomes to demarcate, the bigger the need for demarcation grows. Both the ad hoc police state and the quickly thrown together rebel group are completely compromised from the start, and each new in-group friction feeds into the systematically escalating conflict.

As much as I enjoy Romero's zombie imagery in the DEAD films, its very absence, in combination with the vagueness and almost invisibility of the menace, makes THE CRAZIES into Romero's most radical film.

Even more than usual in early Romero, the barebones production budget works towards the films advantage: from the beginning the film renounces convernional world building in favor of a series of claustophobic, highly effective chamber dramas.

THE CRAZIES feels like something quickly assembled from hand-drawn sketches and cardboard boxes. At the same time it is a masterpiece, maybe Romero's best and almost certainly his purest film.

Pilgrimage, John Ford, 1933

There might be some earlier Ford films (JUST PALS and THREE GODFATHERS, especially), which are stronger works on their own terms, but for me, this is where it finally all flows together. The crushing force of public opinion and, necessarily opposed to it, the proud insistence on individual sorrow. The rejection of moralist stances of any kind. The elevation of myth over truth not as a function of ideology, but of psychology.

And, above all, the visual textures: The pictorialism no longer feels derivative, but is thoroughly bound to Ford's eternal, unresolvable investigations into ambiguities and paradoxes - the idyllic nature scenes at the start already being shot through with premonitions of decay and death. And the solid narrative flow almost constantly being offset by the gestural precision of the actors: Hannah Jessop's way of vehemently, almost aggressively feeding her chicken tells you all you need to know about her.

Charles, mort ou vif, Alain Tanner, 1969

Simon's nuanced and quietly excentric performance saves this from being completely dull, but in the end this is a perfect example of the kind of counterculture-infused drifter cinema I can't relate to. There's no sense of hedonism, of joy, of sex, of freemdom, of fashion... Charles Dé rejects his bourgeois existence solely because of a vague sense of ennui, his rebellion is a theoretical / philosophical stance, not a way of engaging with the world and with his own pleasure. Like in some similarly misguided Wenders films, the exploration of the outside world is rejected almost from the start, in favor of a suffocating sense of all-encompassing interiority, and an escape into hollow patterns of language - which also aren't allowed to become attractions in their own rights by evolving into pure wordplay, but are always bound to the strict psychological self-sameness of everyone involved. Watch Klopfenstein instead. (And Lemke instead of Wenders!)

Viva, Anna Biller, 2007

you know a film has its heart at the right place when one character hands another one an antique wooden duck as a souvenir.

Marjorie Prime, Michael Almereyda, 2017

What a wonderful film... The moment which stuck with me the most was the flashback in the middle. The dark, warm, post-coital glow of the images, the gaze gradually shifting towards the red flags on the television screen... I guess part of why this is a special scene is that these are impossible images, if one takes the film at face value. Because, when memory is always tainted by the present, how can there even be something like a flashback? And yet, here is Marjorie, young again, in love again. For me, the only possible way to react to these images of joyous, sensual, youthful love is to treat them as a present Almereyda himself gives to his character, to Marjorie, thereby declaring cinema's singular power to transcend space and time.

Kung Fu Angels, Herman Yau, 2014

The whole film and especially Karena Ng's performance display a lanky awkwardness which made me somewhat enjoy this, at least during the non-fight scenes. Still, this feels as phoned in as it gets. The relationships between the students are a little bit more nuanced than strictly necessary, but otherwise there's no indication Yau cared one bit about making this. What saddened me about this is the representation of school life, the complete absence of even the possibility of unruliness. In this regard, Hong Kong cinema really has come a long way since 1997.

---

-Why did you bring me cow dung?
-That's me. You're the flower. It's beneath you to be with someone like me. But if you're willing to give this cow dung a chance, i'll provide unlimited nutritients.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

letterboxd backup (2)

Monpti, Helmut Käutner, 1957

dubious plotting not only elevated, but thorougly blown up (not like a bomb, but like fireworks) by käutner's almost manic sense of mise en scene, buchholtz's elastic acting and schneider's hidden sadness. the result might at first be a bit annoying, because everyone involved seems to give in to his / her most baroque instincts, but in the end it turns out to be, i think, a bona fide meta-escapism masterpiece. artifice trumps artifice.

Elle a passé tant d'heures sous les sunlights..., Philippe Garrel, 1985

Shadows of shadows of shadows. This time, the autobiographic fragments that return again and again in Garrel's work never crystallize into at least somehow self-identical bodies (like they do in later films, and even in the previous L'ENFANT SECRET), but float around freely, as if they're up for grabs. He makes one of his most beautiful films by letting go of form, focus, fixed identities, body tension, and sometimes even texture - although I once again got the feeling, that it's just not possible to film a window in Paris without the result being beyond beautiful (of course, that feeling changes at once when leaving Garrel's world...). Every shot in this is at the same time part of an impenetrable illusory maze and completely transparent towards the moment of shooting.

---

Garrel asking Doillon for advice on how best to film his son is the sweetest thing.

The Cannibals, Kao Pao Shu, 1972

Not a particularly carefully crafted film outside of the fight scenes. But oh my god the fight scenes! Ecstatic, joyous, communal celebrations of the pro-filmic like this are at least one of the reasons why movies exist and matter.

Riley the Cop, John Ford, 1928

Starts nice, but more or less hits a brick wall once the plot moves to Germany. I can relate.

The House of 72 Tenants, Chor Yuen, 1972

Come for the perfectly constructed comedic setpieces, stay for the sprawling, all-encompassing sense of community, and stay bewitched for at least weeks thereafter by the beautiful yellow light illuminating scene after scene.

Father and Son, Allen Fong, 1980

A film literally soaked in the specifics of memory. The long stairway leading to the small, humble apartment high above the city, the view of the vast cityscape from above (two boys pittet against a sea of houses down below as if they were spirits roaming the sky, resting in clouds). Children's games on the schoolyard, hierarchies and their unmaking, identity defined by actions and social relationships ("Are you the one who's scaring people with toads?" - "Yes"). Every escape from social control, no matter how small, feels like the ultimate victory.

Objects, meals, toilets.

Simultaneously, this is an earnest, tightly structured, sometimes almost didactic film about the mechanics and value of family. In a way both the boy and the father try to prevent the boy from becoming the father. The action of one always already influences the other, but there's no chance for communication, no escape, just a heartbreaking sense of grief.

For the boy, everything is cinema. But that's mainly a curse, too. His love for illuminated images almost burns down the family home. After being hit by his father, to stop the bleeding a woman puts tobacco on his face - an instant Chaplin moustache. His camera finally falls down and breaks up, just like the leg of the actor in his first amateur film.

Teacher: "What do you want to be?"
Boy: "I want to work at a movie theater."
Teacher: "Why do You want to do that?"
Boy: "So I can watch movies and earn money at the same time"
Well, that's always the idea...

Sinful Confession, Li Han Hsiang, 1974

I've seen only two of Li Han Hsiang's films from his 1970s "hunchback of shawdom" (Stephen Teo) phase so far. Both are episodic softcore farces filmed in elaborate studio sets. Both establish some sort of ordering principle (in Sinful Confession: a game of Mahjong and the presence of Michael Hui in each episode) in the beginning just to let themselves desintegrate completely over the course of the film. Both are vile and ugly, but while Facets of Love is vile and ugly, period, Sinful Confession somehow manages to turn vileness and uglyness into building blocks for something else - which is still vile and ugly, but also interesting and sometimes even awesome.

Especially the first story: Michael Hui plays a newspaper journalist spying with a telescope on a neighboring apartment building / love hotel, but he's mainly just there as a random anchoring point for a perverted, sweeping, freewheeling, devouring gaze. At one point, one of the naked women caught in the fangs of this gaze gets attacked by a masked man - cut to the director and crew of a porno shoot directing both the man and the woman - another cut to gawking men behind a false mirror also watching the scene. Cinema as a closed circuit, the studio as a boiling pot of sexualized madness. Filmmaking, voyeurism and sexual assault flow into one another until they become undistinguishable.

The second story - about a doctor being trapped by a sneaky vamp - is relatively straightforward and feels like something out of a rather dull commedia sexy. But the routines are somewhat elevated by the rather inspired interplay between Hui and Renee Pai (a young, statuesque actress discovered by Li who committed suicide before finishing another film).

The last half hour descends into utter chaos. A bunch of storylines thrown together without any coherence whatsoever - only to end with a cameo by the director himself, who scams Hui out of a meal and makes fun of smug film critics dismissing his movies - a scene Stephen Teo in a great take on Lis carreer identifies as a "manifestation of the plot that is Li Han Hsiang's life vis-a-vis the cinema. It is a statement of faithlessness (though not of hopelessness) that, alas, recognizes the cinema's propensity for philistinism and commercialism".

In other words: Li Han Hsiang's cinema is all about the power of the false. Maybe in a way his masterpieces of the early 60ies are also films about falseness. So his later work might not be a negation, but rather some sort of insentification of his early work: falseness is spreading, taking over form itself. Sinful Confession, especially its last third, is bad filmmaking at almost any measure - but the force of its messy vulgarity can't be denied.
The Other Side of Hope, Akis Kaurismäki, 2017

finding beauty and hope in the physical resistance of matter. might even gain another star when i get hold of one of those 35mm screenings.

Clan of Amazons, Chor Yuen, 1978

or: how to undress a shoe. (amazing how these ku lung adaptations often feel like pop-lacanianism, but with all the clunky marxism removed)

Himmel ohne Sterne, Helmut Käutner, 1955

love is a no man's land

I Am not Your Negro, Raoul Peck, 2016

First of all: Baldwin's prose and presence would be enough to support a much worse film, so for the generous amount of archival footage alone, this is never short of engaging.
At least in theory, I also admire Peck's internationalist fervour and understand his insistence on not being confined to the festival ghetto. But still... I can't help but hope he'll eventually return to the negativistic aesthetics of his early 90s work. Clearly in his newer work, the basic conditions of his imagemaking are not his own but those of the American television market (or even worse, see Le jeune Karl Marx, of various European funding bodies).

The Boxer Rebellion, Chang Cheh, 1976

The Boxer Rebellion, reframed as Chang Cheh body cinema.

Not the young, angry nationalists are the heroes, but a bunch of misfits - never in uniform - on the sidelines, at first at best hesitantly taking part in the fight. Only when everything is lost they start to come alive, in the film's much stronger second half,

Chang Cheh has hardly any interest in historical texture (although one might argue that, when it comes to the depiciton of colonial power, this almost turns his film into meta-critique), and no interest whatsoever in historical forces that cannot be boiled down to body images and hand to hand combat. All those self-important and clueless discussions of tactics, all those competently made but never fully realized battle scenes... The first part ends with a ritualistic celebration, in which Chang Cheh's cinema reaches its own point zero: One fighter after another steps into the open, presenting his body, his fighting techniques, in a way his whole self. Not to dedicate himself to the nation, but to become an object of cinema. In its second half the film strips away history, in order to lay bare an intimately rendered melodrama of masculine masochism.

20th Century Women, Mike Mills, 2016

Fanning demonstrating "manliness" for Jamie by smoking and parading in front of him, knowing fully well he'll never be half as manly as she is... Scenes like that are great but far between. I really couldn't get over all the stuff apparently necessary to turn a generous little comedy into a "portrait of a generation". The endless montage sequences, the ill-advised airy music... Plus I hated almost all scenes with Bening and Crudup, but that's probably unfair.

No U-Turn, Clifford Choi, 1982

A Cinema City comedy, directed by a lesser known New Wave director, that somehow manages to be both humble and extravagant. For the most part, it stays strictly on street level (great location shooting, including at least some hidden camera stuff). Here, on the street, the world is rather strictly separated along gender lines. The men outside in their pimped out cars have trouble differentiating between shopgirls and prostitutes, the women inside in the boutiques shy away from naked men even when they're just photographs of antique statues.

The mood is playful, though. A would-be flasher doesn't hide a dick, but a pistole under his raincoat and when things get moving they move pretty fast. The two leads get to fuck rather early in the film, and this leads to what must be one of the best sex cutaways in film history... or it might just as easily be an hommage I didn't recognize, as this is obviously the work of a movie buff, most explicitly when the images of Dawn of the Dead watched by the protagonists in a cinema later reappear in No U-Turn's own climax.

But the romantic coupling of the leads is also comically doubled in the relationship of two minor characters, and all of these scenes are played out as slapstick of the most vulgar sort. Their first clumsy "love scene" is identified with / commented on by a wrestling match on tv (and introduced with a very weird shot / counter shot-sequence). There's a mean, nihilistic streak running through the whole film (culminating in an extremely gruesome car racing scene) which coexists rather uneasily with its general laid back attitude. A strange, fascinating mixture, a strictly commercial film staying within the compounds of its own genre at all time while still exploring its own little facette of Hong Kong craziness.

Wild At Heart, David Lynch, 1990

Proves that sometimes not even Nic Cage wearing a really nice snakeskin jacket is sufficent reason to make a movie.

Maybe It´s Love, Angie Chen, 1984

A "desperate housewifes of the New Territories" expose slowly taken over by a REAR WINDOW plot. Which in turn gradually morphs into an OUR GANG murder mystery while also serving as an anti-bullying message picture. On top of that: a Cherie Chung workout montage, a Cherie Chung aerobic montage, a prolonged softcore sex scene, animals popping up at weird moments, and a subplot chronicling the sexual self-discovery of the local white guy.

To be sure, except for the very 80s Cherie Chung as visual pleasure stuff none of this works like intended - with the thriller plot at several points turning into a complete trainwreck. But still... there's so much going on, in every single scene... There's a disturbing undertone of sexual violence, an underlying rape threat which seems to throw all social relations off balance, maiming the women, but also unsettling the men. It doesn't really lead anywhere, but still it adds up to a sense of hysteria which is in a strange way only enhanced by the fact that the film doesn't manage (or even try) to transform it into a coherent aesthetic form.

Fuddy Duddy, Siegfried A. Fruhauf, 2016

pure perspective eclipsing all notions of space. pretty awesome.

As Without so Within, Manuela de Laborde, 2016

Light, matter, colour, form, texture, emulsion constantly playing off of each other without any conceptual boundaries. At least in my experience this is a rather rare thing to encounter in avantgarde cinema today: a genuinely curious film.

Foyer, Ismail Bahri, 2016

who'd believe a film about a piece of white paper could be this boring. if there ever was a film tailor-made for high-frequency festival rotation, this is it.

O ornitologo, Joao Pedro Rodriguez, 2016

the far side of camino de santiago

Miss Sloane, John Madden, 2016

when some of it works, it's mostly because of jessica chastain's lipstick.

September, Woody Allen, 1987

When there's a blackout only to make the tone in tone mise en scene even more Bergman-like. This is Allen giving in to his worst instincts almost constantly. Like with most of his work, his trust in actors compensates for many flaws, but in this case Farrow's fine performance feels isolated from the rest of the film.

Lo squadrone bianco, Augusto Genina, 1936

A colonialist adventure setting filtered through fascist melodrama: A weak, lovelorn bourgeois flees his spectacularly arrogant girlfriend (who is borderline crazy herself - played by a statuesque Fulvia Lanzi; strangely, it's her only acting credit, judging from this great performance, she could've easily made it as an Italian Zarah Leander) by enlisting for war in the desert. After at first being despised by his tough guy peers, he earns their respect through both fortitude in battle and erotic self-denial. In the end, he's just another lonely psychopath in the desert.

LO SQUADRONE BIANCO is Duce approved (winner of Coppa Mussolini 1936), and ideologically dubious in more ways than one (although the depiction of Arabs is paternalistic rather than racist, in obvious contrast to German films of the same period set in Africa) but also powerful filmmaking. The long desert campaign in the center of the film reduces the whole world to sand, camels, sweating bodys, and fluorescent shadowplay. The night scenes are especially beautiful: the film abandons the narrative completely, succumbs to a trance-like despair - at one time, there's a cutaway to the heroe's girlfriend visiting an orchester performance. She arrives at her (ultimately pointless) decision to surrender to her man's vanity almost without speaking a single word, it's all done by music and subtle camera movements.

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

2019

1. Il traditore (Marco Bellocchio)
2. The Irishman (Martin Scorsese)
3. The Beach Bum (Harmony Korine)
4. Transit (Christian Petzold)
5. Dragged Across Concrete (S. Craig Zahler)
6. Ask, büyü, vs (Ümit Ünal)
7. Ich war zuhause, aber (Angela Schanelec)
8. Fleischwochen (Joachim Iseni)
9. Le jeune Ahmed (Dardenne Brothers)
10. Ad Astra (James Gray)

I also think a lot about (unranked)
Dead Souls (Wang Bing), La Flor (Mariano Llinas), The Mule (Clint Eastwood), Detective Dee: Four Heavenly Kings (Tsui Hark), High Life (Claire Denis), Hanne (Dominik Graf), Bewegungen eines nahen Berges (Sebastian Brameshuber), Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (Quentin Tarantino), John Wick: Chapter 3 (Chad Stahelski), Where'd You Go, Bernadette (Richard Linklater), The Travelling Cat Chronicles (Koichiro Miki), 6 Underground (Michael Bay), Searching Eva (Pia Hellenthal), Der goldene Handschuh (Fatih Akin), 47 Meters Down (Johannes Roberts), Last Christmas (Paul Feig), Domino (Brian de Palma), Una primavera (Valentina Primavera), It's Me (Eckhart Schmidt)

Thursday, November 28, 2019

Konfetti 48: Konfetti


Zum Abschluss des Blogs (=des Konfetti-Blogs, nicht des Dirty-Laundry-Blogs) kehre ich zu seinem Anfang, beziehungsweise seinem Titel zurück: “[D]ieses Blog”, schrieb ich im ersten Eintrag, wird “ein Jahr lang den Versuch unternehmen, das Kino so anzuschauen, als wäre es Konfetti”. Ich weiß nicht so recht, ob mir das gelungen ist. Ich habe zwar stets versucht, mich von meinem Interesse an den kleinen Sensationen, den Partikularitäten des Kinos leiten zu lassen, von meiner spontanen Faszination für einzelne Bilder, Szenen, Motive; aber vermutlich bin ich doch oft zu schnell von den Sensationen übergewechselt zu den Begriffen, an denen man zwar, wenn man über Filme schreibt, eh nicht vorbeikommt, die aber idealerweise nicht als statischer Sortierkasten für die erst einmal ungerichtete, oder wenigstens produktiv trübe Erfahrung fungieren, sondern stets ihrerseits von den Sensationen affiziert und auch verändert werden sollten.


Nicht erwähnt hatte ich im ersten Eintrag, dass der Titel des Blogs nicht nur auf grundsätzliche Überlegungen verweist, sondern, für mich selbst zumindest, auch auf einen einzelnen Film, auf einen Lieblingsfilm rekurriert: auf Kathryn Bigelows Strange Days, der in seinem Finale die vielleicht spektakulärsten Konfettibilder der Filmgeschichte aufzubieten hat. 


Strange Days ist ein moderner Klassiker des Science-Fiction-Kinos, eine politische Dystopie, die allerdings nur ein paar wenige Jahre in die Zukunft projiziert wird: 1995 produziert, spielt Bigelows bis heute aufwändigste Regiearbeit in den letzten Tagen des alten sowie den ersten Minuten des neuen Jahrtausends und ist gesättigt mit den Diskursen der damaligen Gegenwart. Cyberpunkmotive verweisen auf eine Zeit, in der die Digitalisierung noch als eine Disruption der Gesellschaft von unten beschrieben wurde, als ein Spielfeld für Außenseiter und moderne Freibeuter; außerdem geht es um Rassismus und Polizeigewalt, die Los Angeles Riots des Jahres 1992 werden evoziert - das fiktive L.A., in dem der Film spielt, befindet sich in einem permanenten bürgerkriegsähnlichen Ausnahmezustand - und der Tod des fiktiven Rappers Jeriko One nimmt den Tod des nichtfiktiven Rappers Tupac Shakur ein Jahr später vorweg. 


Wenn es in dem Film dennoch eine genuin utopisches Moment gibt, also etwas, das über die Extrapolation von Gegenwart hinausgeht, dann manifestiert es sich nicht in der Handlung, sondern im atemlosen visuellen Stil, in einer verflüssigten Montage, die nicht mehr analytisch zwischen objektiver und subjektiver Zeit trennt, sowie, eben, in einem Ausstattungsdetail: Im Finale des Films ergießt sich über eine Silvesterparty auf den Strassen von Los Angeles ein nicht enden wollender Konfettiregen. Die Leinwand ertrinkt regelrecht in dem durch die Luft wirbelnden bunten Papier, das mit keinem einzigen Dialogwort erwähnt wird, aber in der letzten Viertelstunde fast jedes einzelne Bild dominiert: Konfetti als Lichtornament vor schwarzem Himmel, Konfetti in action-painting-artigen Arrangements auf dem Boden, vor einer gigantischen Videoleinwand flatternde Konfetti, die fast nach elektronischen Störsignalen ausschauen, das konfettiartig gesprenkelte, spiegelbesetzten Kleid von Juliette Lewis, von Angela Bassets nackten Füßen aufgewirbeltes Konfetti während einer Verfolgungsjagd, ein einzelnes, grünes Konfetti, das an Ralph Fiennes’ Rücken klebt... 


Die Konfetti sind einerseits die konsequente Fortführung und Finalisierung eines visuellen Konzepts, das von Anfang an auf Reizüberflutung angelegt ist. Strange Days überfrachtet den Bildraum systematisch, auf mehreren Ebenen: Die Exzesse der Ausstattung werden verdoppelt durch die Exzesse der nimmermüden Kamerabewegung, verdreifacht durch die hochgradig artifizielle Lichtsetzung und vervierfacht durch die Kakophonie des vielspurigen Sounddesigns. Im Zeitalter digitaler Medien ist diese Form des audiovisuellen Exzesses quantifizierbar: In seiner Besprechung einer BluRay-Veröffentlichung des Films weist Andreas Oswald auf deren außergewöhnlich hohe Datenrate hin und führt als Beleg an: “So zeigt selbst der kolossale Konfetti-Regen beim Showdown keinerlei Kompressionsartefakte (...).” Konfettis im Film sind, unter digitalen Bedingungen, Informationsoverkill. Beziehungsweise sind sie informationstechnisch extrem uneffizient (und eben deshalb können sie, technologisch betrachtet, auch als eine Art Leistungsnachweis fungieren): tausende farbliche bewegliche Elemente, die Rechenleistung verschlingen und dabei kaum einen “inhaltlichen”, erzählerischen Mehrwert haben. Konfetti sind Rauschen, aber schönes Rauschen.


Andererseits verleihen die Konfetti Strange Days dennoch eine neue Qualität, die sich in meiner Wahrnehmung zunächst als eine Art frenetisch-rauschhafte Hochstimmung manifestiert, als eine positive Überreizung. Die bis dahin getrieben düstere Stimmung des Films hellt sich auf, aber nicht etwa, weil die Spannung abfallen würde. Eher werde ich im Konfettiregen in einen Zustand der fiebrigen Euphorie, der gesteigerten Aufmerksamkeit versetzt. Das ornamentale, barocke Moment des Films entfunktionalisiert und entspezifiziert sich, die Welt wird bunt, ohne Grund, und sie wird außerdem weniger Welt. Das bunte Flirren entfremdet nicht nur mich, sondern auch die Figuren im Film vom fiktiven Los Angeles. Alle gemeinsam werden wir aus dem raumzeitlichen Kontinuum der Diegese gerissen und gewinnen gleichzeitig an Glamour. Im Konfettiwirbel wird jedes Gesicht zum Starschnitt.


Es gibt im Verlauf dieser Schlusssequenz eine Einstellung, die die Feier von hoch oben zeigt, gefilmt von einer Kamera, die ein gutes Stück über den Hochhausdächern platziert ist. Aus dieser Perspektive sehen die in den Strassenschluchten feiernden Menschen selbst aus wie Konfetti. Beziehungsweise: Menschen und Konfetti, Substanz und Ornament sind nicht mehr voneinander zu unterscheiden. Das könnte ein tieferer Sinn der Szene zu sein: wir alle sind Konfetti oder werden zumindest zu solchem, in der Zukunft, im neuen Jahrtausend. Als Datenpunkte in den Informationsnetzwerken global agierender Konzerne gleichen und unterscheiden wir uns voneinander wie ein Papierschnipsel vom anderen. 


Konfetti als Präfiguration der digitalen Massen- und Kontrollgesellschaft? So ganz geht auch diese Lesart nicht auf, ihr widerspricht das instabile, flatterhafte des durcheinanderwirbelnden Buntpapiers. Auch das manifestiert sich besonders deutlich in den Aufsichten, die Mensch und Konfetti amalgamieren: Die flimmernde, unregelmäßige Textur, als die die feiernde Menge aus der Distanz erscheint, ist dem analogen Filmkorn näher als dem digitalen Pixel und tatsächlich lässt sich der rauschhafte Sog von Strange Days und insbesondere dieser Schlusssequenz in vollem Umfang nur während einer 35mm-Projektion des Films erfahren. Ähnlich lässt sich auch die ästhetische Struktur von Konfetti beschreiben: sie sind, zumindest so lange sie sich in der Luft befinden, nie mit sich selbst identisch, jede einzelne Konfettikonfiguration ist einmalig, unwiederholbar. Die Konfetti und das Filmbild betten die Figuren und meinen Blick weich, nicht hart. Das Massenornament der Konfetti verschluckt den Einzelnen nicht, es beschützt ihn. Das Konfettikino vermag auch und gerade im Zentrum des wildesten, überdrehtesten Spektakels Inseln der Intimität zu schaffen. Meine Lieblingseinstellung in Strange Days zeigt Angela Bassetts Gesicht, von vereinzelten Konfetti und Lichtreflexionen umflort, im Dunkel einer Limousine verschwindend.